- There is little doubt that Haig was an idiot. In 1926, 10
years after the barbed wire and machinegun defences of the German Army had
proven conclusively that the day of the Horse Cavalry was over Haig wrote
"I believe that the value
of the horse and the opportunity for the horse in the future are likely to be as
great as ever. Aeroplanes and tanks are only accessories to the men and the
horse, and I feel sure that as time goes on you will find just as much use for
the horse - the well-bred horse - as you have ever done in the past".
- This man ordered hundreds of thousands of troops,
his countrymen and 'damned colonials' to attack barbed wire entanglements 40
yards, sometimes 80 yards deep, covered by well placed machine guns in concrete pill-boxes on the
high ground and did so without looking at the ground before during or after the
battles. He did so time and time again and when confronted with the casualty
lists merely said, "The
nation must be prepared to see heavy casualty lists".
- "Success in battle depends
mainly on morale and determination." Haig - 1907
- "The way to capture machine guns
is by grit and determination." Haig - 1915
- "The nation must be taught to
bear losses. No amount of skill on the part of the higher commanders, no
training, however good, on the part of the officers and men, no superiority
of arms and ammunition, however great, will enable victories to be won
without the sacrifice of men's lives. The nation must be prepared to see
heavy casualty lists." Haig June 1916 before the battle of the
Somme (Editors note. And then Monash came along and
proved him totally wrong on these counts).
These are the thoughts about Haig of
some others from that time
-
His war diary is a self-revealing document: frank, truthful, egotistical,
self confident and malicious.
- Henry Hamilton Fyffe,
worked for the Daily Mail
and met Sir Douglas Haig several times during the
First World War. He said
"Haig was, in truth, at close
quarters very disappointing. He looked the part. His face on a postcard was
not less impressive than Kitchener's. But - his face was his fortune. He had
little general intelligence, no imagination. When the official war
correspondents, much against his will, first went out to France, he made
them a speech of "welcome". He said he knew what they wanted.
"Something for Mary Jane in the kitchen to read."
Haig was as shy as a schoolgirl. He was afraid of newspaper men - afraid of
any men but those he gathered round him, and they were mostly like himself.
If ever the history of the war is written as frankly as that of Napoleon's
campaign has been, Haig will be held accountable for the appalling slaughter
in the Somme battles and in Flanders, caused by his flinging masses of men
against positions far too strong to be carried by assault".
|